(14,486 words)
OMG Spitting Image just mocked the mascot of the climate cult, the princess of climate panic, the perpetually pissed off Ms.How Dare You!
Donald Trump had this to say,
Did President Trump Mock Teen Activist Greta Thunberg?
Some people say that because she is only a teenage everyone should refrain from criticizing her. But Ben Shapiro disagrees.
Ben Shapiro DESTROYS Greta’s CRAZY Climate Change Arguments
Ben discusses how the media has pushed Greta Thunberg to the front of the climate change debate and how there are no real solutions being offered.
Why does Greta come up with crazy solutions to climate change? Jordan Peterson thinks she’s crazy, er I mean a confused, autistic teenager driven to the edge of existential terror by a domineering mother and world leaders who treat her as if she’s the Oracle of Delphi.
What Greta brings to the table is a leap before you look, drastic action is required now urgency that would create dire consequences for the planet.
Before I get to the alledged solutions to climate change let’s try to ascertain the extent of the problem. Can we separate fake science from real science and science from politics?
How to Lie Using Science by Comparing Apples to Oranges
Here are examples of scientific fraud done by comparing apples to oranges. In the first example the apple, the surface temperature is being compared to the orange, the air temperature, which is what all weather forecasts use.
That “heat wave” the media said spread through southern Europe last week? Just more climate LIES
07/21/2023 / By Ethan Huff
A major climate deception spread like wildfire last week after the world’s major media outlets falsely reported that southern Europe experienced its warmest temperatures on record.
It turns out that the temperatures measured were ground temperatures as opposed to air temperatures, meaning they measured the temperature of the dirt or asphalt rather than the air two meters above ground, as is usually the norm.
The claim is that southern Europe saw temperatures as high as 48 degrees Celsius, or 118.4 degrees Fahrenheit, in places like Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and Poland. But again, this was ground temperature in some spots rather than air temperature, which was conveniently unspecified in most media reports.
In some cases, the media flat-out lied and claimed that the 48 degrees Celsius figure was the air temperature, which is simply false information aimed to perpetuate the global warming myth.
“Temperatures are sizzling across Europe this week amid an intense and prolonged period of heat,” one report read. “And it’s only just begun. Italy, Spain, France, Germany and Poland are all facing a major heatwave with air temperatures expected to climb to 48°C on the islands of Sicily and Sardinia – potentially the hottest temperatures ever recorded in Europe.”
A follow-up report from the same source did specify that the temperature readings came from “land surface,” and somehow the 48°C figure was magically reduced to 45°C.
(Related: Did you know that the earth’s temperature hasn’t risen in 15 years?)
European Space Agency’s false reporting the “most intense climate lie since temperature recording began”
By the time the anomaly was identified and addressed, the fake news version of events had already spread around the world and solidified in people’s minds. Consequently, many now falsely believe that southern Europe experienced dramatic global warming last week that proves the climate is changing.
The only thing changing are the facts that get reported, as well as the way they get reported. It is all designed to mislead and hoodwink the masses – and by the time people figure it out, the damage has already been done.
The European Space Agency (ESA), the entity responsible for spreading the fake news in the first place, did provide clarification, albeit vague, about the difference between the two temperature readings.
“Land surface temperature is how hot the ‘surface’ of Earth feels to the touch. Air temperature, given in our daily weather forecasts, is a measure of how hot the air is above the ground.”
Notice that even in this explanation, the ESA still failed to mention that surface temperatures are significantly warmer than air temperatures. Readers will still be left with confusion about what difference it even makes to take temperature readings from the ground versus the air.
“What we experienced over the past days was the most intense climate lie since temperature recording began,” reported Germany’s Achtung Reichelt about the ESA’s sloppy and manipulative reporting. “The problem with that report is that none of it is true.”
The hottest it got in Sicily over the weekend was 32°C, or about 89.6°F. This is a far cry from the 48°C that was originally reported.
Spiegel, which also initially reported the false numbers, quietly changed the wording in its report to specify that the 48°C figure came from measurements that “were not the usual air temperature, which can be considerably lower.”
“It’s clear that the authorities and media tries to pull a fast one on the public, but were caught again thanks to careful readers,” reported Watts Up With That about the fiasco.
The latest news about the climate lies coming from the corporate media can be found at Climate.news.
In this next example water temperature in a shallow bay is compared with water temperature in the ocean.
Wrong, Mainstream Media, Florida’s Sea Water Is Not Setting Records
Originally posted at ClimateREALISM
Last week, several media outlets reported on a single seawater temperature of 101.1°F recorded at a buoy in Florida, claiming it was due to climate change. The is false. One single seawater temperature over one day isn’t an indicator of climate change, nor, as the data show, was it unprecedented as media claimed.
Some headlines:
- The Associated Press: South Florida waters hit hot tub level and may have set world record for warmest seawater
- The Guardian: Florida ocean records ‘unprecedented’ temperatures similar to a hot tub
Fox News: Florida water topped 100-degrees twice this week, may have set world record: ‘This is a hot tub. - Al Jazeera: ‘A hot tub’: Florida sees record water temperatures, raising alarm
The Guardian opined:
Records for ocean surface temperature are not kept, but a 2020 study suggested that the highest temperature observed was 99.7F (37.61C) in the Persian Gulf.
…
The growing frequency and intensity of severe weather – both on land and in oceans – is a symptom of the global, human-driven climate crisis that is fueling extremes, experts warn…
In the Associated Press (AP) article, which spawned many of the other articles, there was this statement:
But the buoy at Manatee Bay hit 101.1 degrees Fahrenheit (38.4 degrees Celsius) Monday evening, according to National Weather Service meteorologist George Rizzuto. The night before, that buoy showed an online reading of 100.2 F (37.9 C).
An examination of the actual data from that buoy designated as MNBF1 shows that the peak in temperature of 101.1F (38.4C) was very brief and then the water rapidly cooled off, with such a temperature not being repeated since (see Figure 1 below):
Figure 1 – plot of temperature data from the Manatee Bay (MNBF1) buoy. Image and data from National Data Buoy Center.
However, what the media missed is that MNBF1 is not an ocean buoy at all, in fact it is partially inland, designated as part of the Everglades National Park, and not in the waters of the Atlantic Ocean, as seen in this Google Earth image in Figure 2:
Figure 2: Google Earth image showing placement of buoy MNBF1. Note that it is not actually in the Atlantic, but is behind the Key Largo barrier reef, and in a shallow bay called Manatee bay.
On this Google Earth closeup, seen in Figure 3, we can see this buoy is in exceptionally shallow water, near the shoreline – you can see the bottom of the bay.
Figure 3, Google Earth closeup image showing placement of buoy MNBF1 at Bay Point of Manatee bay.
Note how shallow the water is, enabling you to see the dark bottom.
One of the most important things that the media missed is the fact that due to the shallow water and placement near land, this buoy is sensitive to tides and wide temperature fluctuations due to the shallow nature of the water. With very shallow water, it is very easy for the sun to heat the sand/mud beneath the buoy, which is dark (which will absorb more sunlight), which will then increase the temperature reading recorded in the water.
Indeed, the high temperature reading correlates closely to low tide. Temperature peaked at 2200 HR GMT – which was after low tide at 1:35PM – water had a chance to warm because sunlight was hitting the bottom.
Figure 4A and 4B: Tide data for Manatee Bay and temperature data and time for buoy MNBF1.
The media completely missed the fact that this sort of temperature at that buoy has happened before and this was not the highest temperature ever seen there. The record for the Manatee Bay site is 102 degrees. It was set on Aug. 15, 2017. The data from that buoy only goes back to 2004. With such a short period of data, it cannot possibly be representative of any climate trend, which requires at least 30 years or more of data.
Had the media bothered to check, they would have discovered that the buoy is in shallow relatively stagnant water, somewhat inland, and not in the ocean, and therefore not representative of Atlantic Ocean temperatures. They would have also discovered that it was “not a record,” with higher temperatures previously being recorded at that particular buoy. Furthermore, if they had bothered to check tide table, they would have learned that the high temperature correlated with a lower than normal tide, which allowed the subsurface structures heated by the sun to also contribute to heating the water.
Indeed, the water is so shallow where this buoy is placed, it is entirely possible that the buoy itself rests on muddy tidal bottom during extremely low tides.
But they didn’t bother to check. Instead, following the climate crisis narrative they are pushing, they hyped tales of unprecedented ocean temperatures and warned of impending doom.
Meanwhile, as this link to the live data shows, nature has brought the water temperatures back to expected values for this time of year. It is important to note that The Guardian reported, “Normal water temperatures for the area this time of year should be between 73F and 88F (23C and 31C), according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).”
The “crisis” is over, water temperatures at MNBF1 are back to normal levels, but the incompetent media isn’t reporting on that.
Anthony Watts
Anthony Watts is a senior fellow for environment and climate at The Heartland Institute. Watts has been in the weather business both in front of, and behind the camera as an on-air television meteorologist since 1978, and currently does daily radio forecasts. He has created weather graphics presentation systems for television, specialized weather instrumentation, as well as co-authored peer-reviewed papers on climate issues. He operates the most viewed website in the world on climate, the award-winning website wattsupwiththat.com.
Wrong, Mainstream Media, Florida’s Sea Water Is Not Setting Records
How to Lie Using Computer Models
Inconvenient Truth: 32 Climate Predictions Proven False | Facts Matter
Facts Matter with Roman Balmakov. March 30, 2023.
It’s interesting that before 1979 the climate predictions were about a coming ice age. After 1979 the dire consequences of global warming were the theme.
Many of these predictions were arrived at by feeding incorrect data into a baised computer program and consequently getting an incorrect prediction.
This example just fails to mention that the conclusion about the hottest day ever wasn’t derived from data but from a computer model.
No, the Earth Did Not have an ‘Unprecedented and Terrifying … All-Time High Temperature’ on July 4th – Not the hottest in 100,000 years – NOAA & AP back away from claim.
Meteorologist Anthony Watts: On July 3rd and 4th and the following days, multiple mainstream media outlets ran stories claiming that the Earth had experienced an unprecedented hot day(s). This is false. The data they cited was not official data, but from a private website and investigation shows the claim was a gross error.
Forbes: July 4 Was Earth’s Hottest Day In Over 100000 Years
Apparently, all those people missed the fact that they were looking at the output of a climate model, not actually measured temperatures. Only one news outlet, The Associated Press, bothered to print a sensible caveat…The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration distanced itself from the designation, compiled by the University of Maine’s Climate Reanalyzer, which uses satellite data and computer simulations to measure the world’s condition….
The AP updated its story on July 7th to include this single yet very important paragraph: “NOAA, whose figures are considered the gold standard in climate data, said in a statement Thursday that it cannot validate the unofficial numbers. It noted that the reanalyzer uses model output data, which it called ‘not suitable’ as substitutes for actual temperatures and climate records. The agency monitors global temperatures and records on a monthly and an annual basis, not daily.”
So, in the space of two days, we went from temperature data that was “[t]otally unprecedented and terrifying,” to temperature data that was not suitable for purpose.
By: Admin – Climate Depot
August 2, 2023 8:13 AM
https://climaterealism.com/2023/07/no-the-earth-did-not-have-an-unprecedented-and-terrifying-all-time-high-temperature-on-july-4th/ Anthony Watts
The site everythingclimate.com does an excellent job in debunking climate misinformation.
The 130-Degree F Reading in Death Valley Is A World Record
Con: 134 degrees in 1913 is still the official record and there is no reason to change it.
But here’s something the media tends to ignore. July 1913 had several days at or above 128°F. This is simply “business as usual” for Death Valley. In fact, back in 1913, over 100 years of “global warming” ago, Death Valley’s official weather station at Greenland Ranch also hit 130°F or higher three times that July. This was an intense stretch of hot weather from the 5th through the 14th when the high temperature reached 125°F or higher each and every day. In fact, this 10-day stretch still ranks as the hottest stretch ever recorded in Death Valley. The hottest days in this time period occurred from the 9th through the 13th when the high temperature reached at least 129°F with the hottest being on July 10th when the record-breaking 134°F was measured.
The Global Temperature Record Says We Are in a ‘Climate Emergency’
Con: The widely cited NASA global temperature graph is highly magnified and visually misleading.
The entire graph and temperature data set from NASA GISS is displaying just the small change of 1.1°C of temperature, which is highly magnified to show the trend. Because this small temperature change is magnified, it gives the false impression of having a steep rising slope. For the unobservant, that steep slope looks like a dangerous trend that would constitute a “climate emergency”.
Why Antarctica And Greenland Ice Melt is Not Serious
Writing in the journal Nature, scientists at Columbia University and the University of Victoria, British Columbia report,
The Antarctic continent has not warmed in the last seven decades, despite a monotonic increase in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases. ”The scientists also observe that over the past several decades, “Antarctic sea ice area has modestly expanded.”https://www.nature.com/articles/s41612-020-00143-w
Climate Change is Causing Accelerated 21st Century Surface Warming
Most Observed Warming is Natural
Almost half of the global warming in the 21st century is due to El Niño events
A major uncertainty in figuring out how much of recent warming has been human-caused is knowing how much nature has caused. The IPCC is quite sure that nature is responsible for less than half of the warming since the mid-1900s, but some climate scientists, politicians, activists, and various green energy pundits go even further, behaving as if warming is 100% human-caused.
Climate Change is Increasing the Strength and Frequency of Hurricanes
Hurricanes are Not Getting Worse
Devastating hurricanes occurred long before the invention of SUVs and coal-fired power plants. Real-world hurricane activity shows little or no impact from global warming. Even the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2018 “Interim Report” observes there is “only low confidence for the attribution of any detectable changes in tropical cyclone activity to anthropogenic influences.”
Climate Change Will Increase the Number and Severity of Tornadoes
Tornadoes are Getting Less Dangerous
Despite the lack of sufficient long-term tornado data, there is a very short period of historical data from [1850] to the present that can be analyzed. This historical tornado data, show that the number of all categories of tornadoes has been declining for the past 45 years and the number of strong tornadoes, F3 or higher, has been dramatically declining for the past 45 years.
Climate Change and Crop Production
As global climate modestly warms, U.S. and global crop yields are setting new records almost every year. The same is true for nearly all other nations, too. Thanks in large part to longer growing seasons, fewer frost events, more precipitation, and the fertilization effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide, farmers are producing more food on less land, allowing them to feed a growing global population.
Climate Change is Causing Floods
Flooding is Not Increasing
The U.N. IPCC admits having “low confidence” in even the “sign” of any changes—in other words, it is just as likely that climate change is making floods less frequent and less severe. Even if more flooding occurs in the future, any asserted increase in heavy precipitation would likely reduce drought frequency and severity. This is very important because drought is generally a greater climate concern than abundant precipitation.
On March 20, 2023, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) presented its synthesis report to the UN who instantly embraced it as the final word and gospel truth about the climate crisis. Below is the first apart of the article that contains some very emotional and non scientific language. If you want the whole article I have provided the link. I have done this because I would rather focus on the rebuttal to this report which I’ve provided after the article.
Scientists deliver ‘final warning’ on climate crisis: act now or it’s too late
This article is more than 4 months old
IPCC report says only swift and drastic action can avert irrevocable damage to world
Fiona Harvey Environment editor
Mon 20 Mar 2023 13.00 GMT
Scientists have delivered a “final warning” on the climate crisis, as rising greenhouse gas emissions push the world to the brink of irrevocable damage that only swift and drastic action can avert.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), made up of the world’s leading climate scientists, set out the final part of its mammoth sixth assessment report on Monday.
The comprehensive review of human knowledge of the climate crisis took hundreds of scientists eight years to compile and runs to thousands of pages, but boiled down to one message: act now, or it will be too late.
The UN secretary general, António Guterres, said: “This report is a clarion call to massively fast-track climate efforts by every country and every sector and on every timeframe. Our world needs climate action on all fronts: everything, everywhere, all at once.”
In sober language, the IPCC set out the devastation that has already been inflicted on swathes of the world. Extreme weather caused by climate breakdown has led to increased deaths from intensifying heatwaves in all regions, millions of lives and homes destroyed in droughts and floods, millions of people facing hunger, and “increasingly irreversible losses” in vital ecosystems.
Monday’s final instalment, called the synthesis report, is almost certain to be the last such assessment while the world still has a chance of limiting global temperature rises to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, the threshold beyond which our damage to the climate will rapidly become irreversible.
IPCC climate crisis report delivers ‘final warning’ on 1.5C – video
Kaisa Kosonen, a climate expert at Greenpeace International, said: “This report is definitely a final warning on 1.5C. If governments just stay on their current policies, the remaining carbon budget will be used up before the next IPCC report [due in 2030].”
More than 3bn people already live in areas that are “highly vulnerable” to climate breakdown, the IPCC found, and half of the global population now experiences severe water scarcity for at least part of the year. In many areas, the report warned, we are already reaching the limit to which we can adapt to such severe changes, and weather extremes are “increasingly driving displacement” of people in Africa, Asia, North, Central and South America, and the south Pacific.
Is AR6 the worst and most biased IPCC Report?
By Andy May
This is the text of my presentation on Tom Nelson’s podcast which can be viewed here. The question and answers start at about 18:15 into the interview.
The first IPCC Physical Science Basis report is called “FAR” and was first published in 1990. An updated 1992 version of the report contains this statement:
“global-mean surface air temperature has increased by 0.3°C to 0.6°C over the last 100 years … The size of this warming is broadly consistent with predictions of climate models, but it is also of the same magnitude as natural climate variability. … The unequivocal detection of the enhanced greenhouse effect from observations is not likely for a decade or more.”
(IPCC, 1992, p. 6).
This was an accurate statement at the time, and it is mostly accurate to this day. In the past century (since 1920) temperatures have increased about one degree and I’m not sure we will be able to detect a human enhanced greenhouse effect in ten years, or ever, but otherwise the quote is still accurate. One degree of global warming in a century is well within natural climate variability according to historical records and records of glacier advances and retreats (Vinós, 2022, pp. 89-107).
Glaciers exist today, where no glaciers existed during the Medieval Warm Period from about 800 to 1200AD and during the Holocene Climatic Optimum from about 7500 to 4500BC. In addition, the Vikings farmed parts of Greenland where permafrost exists today. Ötzi, the Tyrolean iceman, who was frozen into a glacier about 5,000 years ago, and only recently discovered in his glacier tomb, can attest to the fact that modern glaciers are more advanced than they were before 3000BC.
The second report, called SAR was published in 1996 and 1997. Chapter 8 was a major issue when it came out because in the original draft, the scientists who wrote it all agreed to include this statement:
“no study to date has both detected a significant climate change and positively attributed all or part of that change to anthropogenic causes.”
(Final draft, approved by all 36 authors, SAR, July 1995)
Yet, in the final meeting of the IPCC supervising committee of government politicians, the editors and lead authors of the IPCC on November 29th, 1995, which went very late and into the early morning of November 30th, this statement was changed to read:
“The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate.”
(IPCC, 1996, p. 4).
This change was agreed by the lead authors and political representatives of the participating countries, and without consulting the scientists who wrote and approved the final draft months earlier (May, 2020c, pp. 230-235). The change caused an uproar in the scientific community with Frederick Seitz, the 17th president of the United States National Academy of Sciences, writing about it in the Wall Street Journal (1996), under the headline “A Major Deception On Global Warming.”
In the article, Seitz writes:
“In my more than 60 years as a member of the American scientific community, including service as president of both the National Academy of Sciences and the American Physical Society, I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.”
Frederick Seitz, the 17th president of the United States National Academy of Sciences
He did not choose the word “corruption” lightly.
The third report “TAR” was published in 2001. It was seriously tarnished by the inclusion and promotion of the notorious “hockey stick” graph that was later shown to be seriously flawed due to major statistical errors and the inclusion of seriously flawed data.
Even so, the IPCC included the following statement that was based on the flawed hockey stick:
“In the light of new evidence and taking into account the remaining uncertainties, most of the observed warming over the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations.”
(IPCC, 2001, p. 699).
Numerous reports, peer-reviewed articles, most notably by Stephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick, Edward Wegman, and the U.S. National Research Council, detailed the numerous flaws in the graph (May, 2020c, pp. 164-198). Analysis showed that random red noise could be fed into the statistical algorithm that was used to create the hockey stick and it still produced hockey sticks.
The fourth report “AR4” issued this statement:
“Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”
(IPCC, 2007b, p. 10).
This was very much like what was written in TAR where the same conclusion was based on the now discredited hockey stick. AR4 backed away from the hockey stick, admitting it was flawed, but it also claimed that there was a very high chance that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035. This is an impossibility it turned out, and the head of the AR4 effort, Rajendra Pachauri had to back down and apologize for the error.
This and other problems with the report led to a U.N. InterAcademy Council investigation that found that the IPCC guidelines for their reports had not been followed and that serious bias had crept into AR4. They also found that a full range of peer-reviewed views were not included.
AR5, published in 2013, included the following statement:
“More than half of the observed increase in global mean surface temperature (GMST) from 1951 to 2010 is very likely due to the observed anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations.”
(IPCC, 2013, p. 869)”
n AR6 we read the following:
“The likely range of human-induced change in global surface temperature in 2010–2019 relative to 1850–1900 is 0.8°C to 1.3°C, with a central estimate of 1.07°C, encompassing the best estimate of observed warming for that period, which is 1.06°C with a very likely range of [0.88°C to 1.21°C], while the likely range of the change attributable to natural forcing is only –0.1°C to +0.1°C.”
(AR6, page 59).
Thus, they now claim that it is likely all the warming since the 19th century is due to humans. And this is despite the fact that in the tropical troposphere their climate models are statistically invalidatedifthey include human greenhouse gas emissions in the model.
They were warned to avoid confirmation bias and that the AR5 models were running too hot.
Yet, in AR6, they made the models run even hotter than in AR5 and they ignored dissenting opinions by Richard Lindzen, Roger Pielke Jr., John Christy, Ross McKitrick and many other prominent climate scientists.
Besides sea surface temperatures, the IPCC/CMIP climate models have a serious problem with clouds. They cannot model clouds. It is well known and accepted that clouds are net cooling, but how do they respond when surface temperatures rise? What is the net feedback of clouds when the world warms? They don’t know and the uncertainty in the cloud response to warming is nearly as large as the total uncertainty in all modeled surface warming feedbacks.
We find this in AR6 on the subject:
“… CMIP6 models have higher mean ECS and TCR [climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases] values than the CMIP5 generation of 50 models. They also have higher mean values and wider spreads than the assessed best estimates and very likely ranges within this [AR6] Report. These higher ECS and TCR values can, in some models, be traced to changes in extra-tropical cloud feedbacks that have emerged from efforts to reduce biases in these clouds compared to satellite observations (medium confidence). The broader ECS and TCR ranges from CMIP6 also lead the models to project a range of future warming that is wider than the assessed warming range”
(AR6, p 927).
Translation: We adjusted our cloud feedback parameters to try and fix the mismatch with the real world and when we did that, the already too-warm models got worse. They are clearly in that stage of their modeling effort that every time they try and fix a mismatch, they break something else. It is a sign that their models are missing some vital component of climate.
They are fundamentally changing their models such that they cannot be refuted by observations. By hypothesizing a continually changing climate state, they are making their already unfalsifiable ideas even more unfalsifiable. As Karl Marx and his followers found out, if your hypothesis is fluid enough, you can conclude whatever you want, and no one can challenge you. From Karl Popper, 1962, page 37:
“The Marxist theory of history, in spite of the serious efforts of some of its founders and followers, ultimately adopted [a] soothsaying practice. In some of its earlier formulations (for example in Marx’s analysis of the character of the ‘coming social revolution’) their predictions were testable, and in fact falsified. Yet instead of accepting the refutations the followers of Marx re-interpreted both the theory and the evidence in order to make them agree. In this way they rescued the theory from refutation; but they did so at the price of adopting a device which made it irrefutable. They … destroyed its much-advertised claim to scientific status.”
(Popper, 1962, p. 37).
What Andy May failed to note is the name of the Popper’s publication which is Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge
So now AR6 claims that as surface temperatures rise, the feedbacks to that warming change. In one fell swoop, they both explain why their models do not match observations and they invalidate those pesky observation-based calculations of climate sensitivity that are so much less than their model-based estimates.
In closing, I could go on and on, but the bottom line is that AR6 is the worst and most biased IPCC Physical Science Basis report ever. SAR through AR5 were bad, but AR6 is beyond help.
Take this from one of the few who has read all of them.
It is very clear that the IPCC is losing the public, polls repeatedly show the world population does not believe global warming is a priority. Recent polls show that skepticism about human-caused climate change is increasing around the world. A recent University of Chicago poll found that the belief that humans have caused all or most climate change slumped to 49% from 60% just five years ago. Seventy percent of the U.S. public are unwilling to spend more than $2.50 a week to combat climate change.
60% of U.S voters believe that climate change has become a religion that has nothing to do with climate. Billions of dollars, six major reports that total 6,543 pages (2,391, or nearly half of them are in AR6 as shown in figure 6) and a total of 47 reports of all kinds, and the public has not been convinced that climate change is important. It’s time for the IPCC to reform or give up, in my opinion.
Further confirmation that the climate change agenda is just socialism in disguise is this quote by Mark Steyn from the forward to Marc Morano’s book.
The Green New Deal is their ultimate omnibus spending bill: it asserts jurisdiction over every aspect of life—which is to say every aspect of you. At their Monday night poker game in Hell, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot must be laughing their socks off: “ ‘Oh, we’re only doing this to save the planet’? Why didn’t we think of that?”
Morano, Marc (2021-03-22). Green Fraud: Why the Green New Deal Is Even Worse than You Think . Regnery Publishing. Kindle Edition.
For more details about the flaws in AR6 read the Clintel report. It was created by an international team of scientists, from seven countries around the world. It has been extensively peer-reviewed by some of the world’s top climate scientists. The cover is shown below as figure 7. It is available as a low resolution pdf for download at clintel.org and will be for sale as a proper ebook or paperback at Amazon, Kobo, and Barnes and Noble on May 29th.
Let’s consider some more debunking of the climate emergency.
John Christy Debunks Climate Models and Extreme Weather Hysteria With Laura Ingraham on FOX News
1,200 scientists, scholars: ‘There is no climate emergency’
Posted by ClarkCountyToday.com Date: Friday, August 19, 2022.
‘Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions’
Art Moore
WND News Center
Led by a Nobel Prize laureate, more than 1,100 scientists and scholars have signed a document declaring climate science is based more on personal beliefs and political agendas than sound, rigorous science.
The World Climate Declaration states climate science “should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific.”
“Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming, while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures,” the declaration reads.
The declaration was organized by Climate Intelligence, an independent policy foundation founded in 2019 by Dutch emeritus professor of geophysics Guus Berkhout and Dutch science journalist Marcel Crok.
The U.K. website the Daily Sceptic reported one of the lead authors of the declaration, atmospheric physicist Richard Lindzen, has called the current climate narrative “absurd.” Yet relentless propaganda from grant-dependent academics and agenda-driven journalists has generated a widely accepted narrative that the science is “settled.”
“We should free ourselves from the naïve belief in immature climate models,” the WCD states. “”In future, climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.”
Last week, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act, which spends $368 billion for “green” energy with the aim of reducing CO2 emissions by 40% by 2030. When Joe Biden was vice president under Barack Obama, the administration subsidized “green” energy with the aim of reducing CO2 emissions by 40% by 2030. When Joe Biden was vice president under Barack Obama, the administration subsidized “green” energy with federal grants and tax breaks. Joe Biden himself announced in 2009 a $535 million loan guarantee for the solar panel company Solyndra to go along with $700 million in venture capital funding. Biden said the plant built with that money would power more than half a million homes. But two years later, the company filed for bankruptcy and shut down its operations.
The World Climate Declaration points out that since emerging from the Little Ice Age in the mid-19th century, the world has warmed significantly less than predicted by the U.N.’s International Panel on Climate Change’s models
“The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change,” the WCD states.
The declaration argues Earth’s climate has varied, with cold and warm periods, for as long as the planet has existed, and it is “no surprise that we are experiencing a period of warming.”
The climate models “are not remotely plausible as global policy tools,” ignoring, for one, the benefits of carbon dioxide, which is “not a pollutant.”
“It is essential to all life on Earth,” the declaration says. “Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth; additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yield of crops worldwide.”
There is no statistical evidence, the signatories say, “that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and such-like natural disasters, or making them more frequent.”
“There is no climate emergency. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”
Last year, Steven Koonin, an under-secretary of science in the Obama administration, published a book titled “Unsettled” that said “the science is insufficient to make useful projections about how the climate will change over the coming decades, much less what our actions will be.”
The idea that climate change is settled demeans and chills the scientific enterprise, he contended, “retarding its progress in these important matters.”
In 2020, the long-time green activist Michael Shellenberger wrote a book called “Apocalypse Never” that lamented the conversation about climate change has “spiraled out of control.”
But why do we continue to see so many more news articles and videos that add to climate alarmism than stories that douse this fever?
Climate change “news” coverage is BOUGHT with grants that fund corporate media – just like how Pfizer pays for FAKE NEWS promoting COVID jabs
Thursday, June 01, 2023 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: biased, climate alarmism, climate change, conspiracy, corruption, deception, environment, fake news, fraud, funding, global warming, green tyranny, Journalism, left cult, mainstream media, money supply, news cartels, Poynter Institute, propaganda, truth
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
Bypass censorship by sharing this link: https://citizens.news/731155.html
Copy URL
6,700Views
(Natural News) The Associated Press (AP) has been putting out a whole lot of glowing climate change propaganda lately, including endorsements for what it describes as “Joe Biden’s hard-hat environmentalism.” It turns out that the AP is being paid by the climate industry to peddle such tripe, much like how Pfizer pays for fake news segments promoting Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines.”
The Federalist conducted an analysis recently that specifically looks at AP stories about “climate change,” “global warming,” and “climate disaster.” Such stories number in the hundreds, and in 2022 alone, the AP took in $8 million in “grant” money for the favor.
All that money goes straight into the AP‘s so-called “Climate Journalism Initiative,” which aims to employ 20 brand-new reporters whose job it will be to “transform how the AP covers the climate story.” Did these alleged reporters come up with the phrase “Biden’s hard-hat environmentalism,” we wonder?
In another of AP climate brainwashing, reporters mentioned former top Clinton adviser John Podesta, who is repeatedly quoted as overseeing the Biden regime’s Inflation Reduction Act and the $369 billion that was allotted for the regime’s green energy endeavors.
Nowhere in the AP report is it mentioned even once that Podesta has a questionably devious political history, having been dubbed the “White House cleanup chief” during the corrupt Clinton years.
“As a wire service, the hard-hat rebranding from the AP will appear in thousands of newspapers across the world as news,” writes The Federalist‘s Larry Behrens. “We don’t know if the millions the AP received for climate coverage played a role in helping Biden rebrand his energy policy, and that’s precisely the point.”
(Related: According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who is running for president, “mega billionaires” are behind the climate change scam and the tyranny it is foisting upon us all.)
As they bankrupt local newspapers, the climate machine is replacing their reporters with new climate propagandists
As the world forges ahead into the abyss of the digital age, local newspapers everywhere are either struggling to survive or are already bankrupt. And ready to replace them are the hordes of climate propagandists being hired by the likes of the AP and funded by the federal government with your tax dollars.
It is a devious scheme that has been a long time coming, and the plan all along has been to eliminate all truthful reporting by starving the independent media of funding. Once obliterated, the climate brigade lies in wait to rebuild from the ashes a new “green”-centric propaganda machine, which it is now doing all across the country and around the world.
“It is no secret that across the country, particularly in rural areas, newspapers are struggling to survive,” Behrens explains.
“It’s not unusual to walk into a small-town newspaper and find one person covering what used to be two or even three different full-time positions. The environmental left recognized this struggle and is now providing money and reporter reeducation to fill the void with its own version of the news.”
One recent example of this is the nationally recognized Poynter Institute, which offered $15,000 grants to reporters or newsrooms willing to cover the Great Lakes area of North America – but with a catch. In order to qualify, potential grantees have to provide Poynter with “A brief description of what they will probe, why they believe there is a story to be told, and how they plan to report the story.”
In other words, in order to get that sweet, sweet cash, a reporter or newsroom must report the way Poynter expects: with a pro-climate change bent that accelerates the “green”-ification of the planet.
The Poynter Institute, by the way, gets “funding support” from the Joyce Foundation, which according to documents filed with the IRS is funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies, the brainchild of billionaire climate darling Michael Bloomberg.
The latest news about climate change and global warming can be found at GreenTyranny.news.
Sources include:
TheFederalist.com NaturalNews.com
Dr. Judith Curry is one of the few scientist who has not been paid off to lie about climate change.
Judith Curry: How Climate “Science” Got Hijacked by Alarmists
Aug 8, 2023
Climate alarmists insist there’s a “scientific consensus” that says climate change is a crisis, and man causes it! Researcher Judith Curry tells me, “it’s a manufactured consensus.”
Since we seldom here any good news about the climate and the environment we may think that there isn’t any good news. But actually there is but you have to go to https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/?s=climate to find these stories.
By Andy Corbley Nov 24, 2022
Beavers Building Dams are Protecting the Rivers Threatened by Climate Change in Colorado
Animals Nov 14, 2022
EU Smashes 2020 Climate Target, Records 34% Drop in Emissions to Lowest Level Since 1990
World Jun 5, 2022
One Million ‘Wonder Plant’ Seedlings Are Planted in Wales to Fight Climate Crisis—and Create Healthy Seas
Good Earth Mar 15, 2020
There are 53 pages of positive stories on this web page. Since there are 20 stories per page that makes a total of 1,060 stories that the MSM rarely cover.
Are all the forest fires caused by global warming?
At the present moment fires rage in Canada and Hawaii. The real causes of these fires may surprise you.
Nova Scotia police thwart three arson attacks as media blames ‘climate change’ for wildfires.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police have arrested several arsonists across the country as wildfires engulf Canada in its worst-ever fire season.
Wed Jun 14, 2023 – 4:41 pm EDT
(LifeSiteNews) — Nova Scotia authorities determined that three fires were deliberately set as mainstream media continues to blame wildfires on “climate change.”
On June 2, the Nova Scotia Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) reported that arson was the cause of three fires in Pictou County but attest that none of the three arson attacks led to wildfires as they were discovered in time.
“We need all Nova Scotians to take the wildfire situation as seriously as we are. We are still finding cases of illegal burning, and it has to stop,” Minister of Natural Resources and Renewables Tory Rushton said in a news release.
“We’re taking every measure to prevent new fires from starting,” he added. “All Nova Scotians need to do their part – follow the burn ban, stay out of the woods and help keep your families and communities safe.”
The province has since raised the fine for breaking the provincial burn ban from $237.50 to $25,000.
According to the RCMP, the three fires were successfully extinguished before developing into wildfires.
This is not the first time that fires have been intentionally started in Nova Scotia. In late May, RCMP reported two cases of arson while wildfires continued to burn out of control across the province.
Similarly, other provinces are experiencing arson attacks amid the worst known fire season. In the past months, RCMP have arrested several arsonists who have been charged with lighting fires across provinces, including Yukon, British Columbia, and Alberta.
In Quebec, satellite footage shows the mysterious simultaneous eruption of several blazes across the province.
The motive behind lighting fires across Canada is unclear, but there have been multiple verified recent incidents over a wide geographical area.
US Canada Catholic
Despite numerous arrests, mainstream media outlets continue to publish articles attributing the wildfires to climate change.
“Rise in extreme wildfires linked directly to emissions from oil companies in new study,” the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation(CBC) reported.
“Canadian forest fires are the latest costly climate disaster that public accounts fail to capture,” another CBC headline read.
“Climate change is increasing the risks of wildfires in the country, experts say,” Global News attested.
Despite these claims, statistics from Canadian National Fire Database reveal that wildfires across Canada have consistently decreased in recent years, having peaked in 1989.
Notably, mainstream media outlets attributing the increase of wildfires to climate change have received funding from the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, which is actively pushing for increased bans on the use of natural resources in Canada to combat “climate change.”
About this potential conflict of interest, retired Canadian colonel David Redman recently testified that legacy media outlets are “ministries of propaganda,” with multiple former mainstream media employees also making similar comments about their past employers.
Footage of a directed energy attack (DEW) used on Maui, Hawaii
https://www.bitchute.com/video/o7RXTBYUkGz1/
MAUI FIRE: DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON PROBABILITY
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oOUwNZqe0QU6/
The Carr fire near Redding, California in July of 2018 left the same unusual remains. Forest Fires that Don’t Burn the Forest – DEW Lasers Confirmed Again.
MAUI GOT DEWED, VIDEOS BEING TAKEN DOWN FROM THE INTERNET PLATFORMS LIKE YOUTUBE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eWZ9e6FFTRPr
DEW in Chile caught LIVE on camera!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KszVwfYaw2ne
A DEW weapon can target a single vehicle.
DEW ATTACK CAUGHT ON CAMERA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/4n8amLfsroPf/
But how about all the droughts, floods, hurricanes and weird weather we have been experiencing? HAARP installations have been modifying the weather for decades.
HAARP – (HIGH-FREQUENCY ACTIVE AURORAL RESEARCH PROGRAM)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/kJ959F2g1oEi
The major earthquakes in February in Turkey happened just days after Turkey refused to allow Sweden to join NATO because it would push the world towards WW3. Two weeks after the earthquakes Turkey agreed to let Sweden into NATO. Were these earthquakes caused by HAARP?
Photos taken just before the earthquakes in Turkey.
Of course photos can be faked but Romainian Senator Diana Sosoasa is sure it was an attack by HAARP.
BOMBSHELL – STATEMENTS MADE BY ROMANIAN SENATOR DIANA SOSOACA REGARDING TURKEY FAKE EARTHQUAKES!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/KYAmQigNHt88
Edward Snowden thinks that HAARP can be used to assassinate people. I know this is off topic but it’s too important not to share.
EDWARD SNOWDEN: 𝗛𝗔𝗔𝗥𝗣 ASSASSINATION AGENDA⁉️🌧🧠⚡️
https://www.bitchute.com/video/X3RR3M6RstUA
Can a DEW cause a volcan0 to erupt?
CLAIM: Hunga Tonga volcanic explosion in January 2022 was STAGED by globalists to unleash Operation Heat Wave
08/14/2023 // Ethan Huff // 9.8K Views
Tags: big government, Climate, climate alarmism, conspiracy, deception, depopulation, Directed Energy Weapon, eruption, explosion, geoengineering, global warming, Globalism, green tyranny, heat wave, Hunga Tonga, Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha?apai, inside job, natural disasters, Operation Heat Wave, overlords, Tonga, volcanic eruption, volcano, weather, weather control
All the hot weather this summer that the globalists desperately want us to believe is because of “global warming” and man-made “climate change” is a government psy-op involving weather manipulation and the triggering of volcanic eruptions, i.e., the Hung Tonga explosion that occurred in January 2022.
A veteran intelligence analyst and former United States military officer told State of the Nation that a program called Operation Heat Wave was launched to trigger the Hunga Tonga explosion and later trigger the “heat wave” that we are told is now occurring in 2023.
Because the Hunga Tonga explosion occurred underwater – and probably also because it was the product of government geoengineering – it received very little media attention. Very few people even know it happened, and even fewer are tying it to the very hot summer that people in some parts of the world are reporting.
“When the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano erupted on Jan. 15, 2022, it sent a tsunami racing around the world and set off a sonic boom that circled the globe twice,” reports explain.
“The underwater eruption in the South Pacific Ocean also blasted an enormous plume of water vapor into Earth’s stratosphere – enough to fill more than 58,000 Olympic-size swimming pools. The sheer amount of water vapor could be enough to temporarily affect Earth’s global average temperature.”
(Related: Check out our earlier report about the mysterious, puzzling concentric ripples that were seen in the atmosphere during the Hunga Tonga explosion.)
Is there anything the government doesn’t control?
Commenting on the explosion at the time it occurred, Luis Millán, an atmospheric scientist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Southern California, told the media that he and his colleagues have “never seen anything like it.”
The reason, of course, is because it was artificially prompted to create a cascade of seemingly catastrophic “warming,” all to push the myth of global warming and man-made climate change.
In a way, the climate is changing, in some ways, because very powerful people are inducing it through weather manipulation and geoengineering weapons. In this case, Hunga Tonga appears to have been detonated, so to speak, in order to excuse the encroaching “green” agenda while rallying more support for it.
If enough gullible people fall for the lie that extreme weather events are the cause of gas-powered cars and people eating meat, then the government can stage as many Hunga Tonga events as necessary to fuel that narrative while blaming it on We the People.
Just like what happened in the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes, which some believe were also artificially triggered, the Hunga Tonga explosion was unprecedented. Seismologists say it bears all the signs associated with a highly technologically advanced directed energy weapon (DEW).
With enough energy directed at just the right location, the powers that be can set off earthquakes and volcanic eruptions at whim, it would seem. And the consequences they are then able to easily blame on whichever bogeyman is popular at any given time – right now it is meat-eaters and people who drive cars and live life that are in the crosshairs for “warming” the planet.
The ultimate endgame of all this is massive depopulation and a recreation of the world under a one-world government. Only a unified global response, we are told, can stop the climate from changing.
Chemtrails play an important role in this as well, as they are used to steer the weather, create rain – or deprive target areas of it – and do all sorts of other nefarious things that most people have no idea are taking place, which is the goal.
The latest news about how the government controls the weather and natural disasters can be found at Geoengineering.news.
Sources for this article include:
StateOfTheNation.co NaturalNews.com
In 2019 Micheal Moore made a movie called, Planet of the Humans. A better title would be Climate Solutions That Don’t Work for a Problem That Doesn’t Exist.
Michael Moore Presents, Planet of the Humans | Full Documentary | Directed by Jeff Gibbs.
Michael Moore’s “Planet of the Humans”, is a documentary that dares to say what no one else will — that we are losing the absurd battle to stop so-called #climatechange on planet Earth because we are following leaders who have sold us out. The “green movement” is Green with Envy and Greed. The Hypocrites, Al Gore, and Bill McKibbon are making millions on this #GreenMovement Scam of #Renewables (#Biomass Burns Trees instead of Coal). This film is a strange wake-up call to Leftists who are being duped into believing the Climate Change Cult. Michael Moore, who is a socialist, came about this Greed and Corruption in 350.org using Anthropogenic Global Warming and the push for So-called 100% renewables which includes Bio-Mass.
This documentary exposes the utter and complete hypocrisy and stupidity of the Green Movement with their Renewable energy Greed cult.
This Documentary could also be called “Planet of the Inconsistent, Deluded and Brainwashed Humans”, who are Ignorant and Gullible, and are the useful idiots of the Left to bring in full government control and #Socialism.
“Never let a Crisis go to waste!” and if there is no Crisis then create one via the Education system and the Fakenews Media and exploit it.
Since you may have better things to do that watch this documentary that is 1 hour and 39 minutes long I have summarized the main points for you.
Solar panels are only 8% efficient. A solar array the size of a football field will only provide enough electricity for ten homes.
Wind turbines wear out after 20 years and have to have a fossil fuel backup if there is no wind.
Ethanol production relies on a large amount of corn and coal.
Richard Heisberg, author of The End Of Growth analysized 25 energy options and concluded that none of them were sufficient to maintain our current standard of living.
Ozzie Zehner, author of Green Illusions, was interviewed for this movie. He made these salient points.
Contrary to popular belief solar panels are not made from sand because it has too many impurities. Quartz and coal are combined and heated in a coal furnace.
Coal plants are being replaced by another fossil fuel, natural gas.
There are no technological fixes but we want to believe there is. People are desparate to accept any solution. I disagree with this. However the plans for the low cost fixes are locked in the vaults of the banksters.
Battery storage is less that one tenth of 1% of the total requirement. Batteries degrade in two years and have to be replaced in five.
Telsa’s gigafactory and Apple claim to use 100% recycleable energy. This is a lie. In fact all cities and factories that claim to use 100% recycleable energy are lying.
Making wind turbines, solar cells and batteries uses sliver, silicon, cobalt, graphite, steel, coal, nickel, sulfer hexafluoride(23,000x worse that CO2), polymers, rare earth metals, copper, lithium, tin, ammonium fluoride, lead cadium, ethylene vinyl acetate and petroleum.
Green energy will not save us. Biomass facilities burn trees to create electricity. Some burn railway ties or garbage that creates toxic pollution.
350.org and the Sierra Club got out of bed with the coal companies and into bed with the logging companies. Burning forests which absorb CO2 will destroy one of our best defences against climate change.
Jeremy Grantham is a billionaire who donated 3M to the Sierra Club and profits substancially when forest are cut down for biomass fuel.
Goldman Sachs kicked the indigenious people off their land to grow sugar cane to make ethanol.
Green Century Equity Fund recommended by Bill McKibben has less than 0.6% solar and wind and 99%+ of mining, oil and gas stocks.
McDonalds, Coca-Cola, BlackRock and many banks are invested in deforestation.
The Sierra Club is partners with Aspiration Funds. The portfolio includes Monsanto, Halliburton, Boeing, Occidental Petroleum,Chevon, Exxon, Gaspro and Viva the world’s largest consumer of forests.
Capitalists have taken over the environmental movement completely.
The Union of Concerned Scientists has become the union of concerned salesmen who have accepted millions to create markets for electric cars.
The NY times partnered with Exxon to give you the good news about biofuels.
Treehugger.com was founded and funded by the logging company Georgia-Pacific which is owned by the Koch brothers who are the largest reciepent of bioenergy subsidies in the USA.
360.org is funded by the Rockefellers.
What’s next? Climate lockdowns, of course. Sears talks about the climate lockdown plan for Oxfordshire, England (0:00 to 2:40)
Just Say YES to Climate Lockdowns!
Depopulation Disguised As the New Green Deal
Mike Adams covers how the depopulation agenda is moving ahead in twelve concise points. Points #1, #4 and #10 are directly related to the new green deal. The other points provide more proof of the existence of this agenda. Other points he doesn’t cover are that the LGBTQ+ movement, abortion on demand and the persistant fearmongering about the dire state of the planet which has convinced young couples not to have children also help to decrease the population.
Twelve undeniable signs globalists are engineering the end of humanity
07/30/2023 // Mike Adams // 64.4K Views
Excerpts
#1) They are terraforming the planet through planetary-scale atmospheric alterations – Large-scale efforts are under way right now to alter the chemistry of planet Earth in order to make it inhospitable to human life by removing CO2 from the atmosphere through “carbon sequestration” efforts. Since CO2 is necessary for all photosynthesis — which drives the web of life on planet Earth — this effort would collapse all food crops, rainforests, marine ecosystems and more, ultimately killing off virtually all animals and human beings on the planet if not stopped. Without CO2 in the atmosphere, there is essentially no recognizable life on planet Earth, and yet the entire “climate cult” machine (and nearly all Democrats, media propagandists, government regulators, globalists, etc.) are at war with CO2 and are trying to completely eliminate it from Earth’s atmosphere.
2) The biometric inventory of the human race (WorldCoin) has begun, and all humans will be “inventoried” so that globalists can properly track their depopulation milestones – The WorldCoin effort to scan everyone’s eyeballs and create an encryption key based on their biometrics is actually a “human inventory” scheme to digitally record all the human beings known to exist on the planet. This step is necessary to track human depopulation milestones and identify anyone who has not been inventoried by the system… “Unscannable!” from Idiocracy, in other words.
3) They’ve given up on educating young people to be prepared for a productive future – Notice that government-run schools no longer teach anything resembling practical skills, independent thinking or even basic knowledge needed to carry out jobs in a productive society. This is because there is no plan to deploy the younger generations of human beings in any productive activity whatsoever. The plan is to exterminate them, and when you are planning to exterminate a population, you don’t need to bother teaching them skills or knowledge. The abandonment of education — a scheme now fully endorsed by teachers’ unions, by the way — is a proxy for the abandonment of any hope in the future of the human race.
4) Controlled demolition of energy infrastructure that drives human economies – As discussed above, the planned take down of the energy infrastructure is engineered to cause both economic collapse and food scarcity leading to mass starvation. Without affordable, abundant energy, no civilization can thrive. As energy is deliberately cut off, civilizations implode and die. Even though we live in a world with abundant energy, the fascist governments of the world — i.e. western nations like the USA, Canada, Germany, etc. — are prohibiting access to that energy on purpose. The outcome of this is not in question: The collapse of western civilization.
5) Governments are funding, developing and deploying anti-human genetic bioweapons – As if engineered starvation and economic collapse weren’t enough by themselves, western governments like the United States of America are continuing to fund genetic bioweapons that target the human race. The spike protein is one such weapon, and it was engineered into both the covid plandemic and the mRNA vaccines which are designed to maim and kill as many human beings as possible. The US Dept. of Defense is the instigator of these bioweapons, and they have a long history of running illegal bioweapons laboratories in countries like Ukraine (and various African nations as well) while actively developing self-replicating bioweapons which feature ethnic targeting based on genetic differences in biology.
6) There is a coordinated, global effort to destroy seed diversity and make crops unable to reproduce – To make sure that free people can’t grow their own food, a global effort is also under way to control the seed supply and to collapse seed diversity while transitioning agriculture to toxic, genetically engineered seeds that grow crops which synthesize pesticide chemicals right into the crop itself (such as with GM corn). Seed giants like Monsanto (now Bayer) have bought up many smaller seed suppliers over the years, wiping out seed diversity and nearly monopolizing the agricultural supply chain for crop production. This centralization of food production into the hands of a few, powerful corporations is one of the necessary steps to weaponizing food scarcity and using engineered famine as a tool for social control and mass compliance with government demands.
7) Rapid rollout of automation robots to replace blue collar workers and transport drivers – Laborers are about to be made obsolete, thanks to a slew of automation robots that are about to be unleashed into the workforce. Warehouse workers will soon be replaced by bipedal warehouse robots that can handle nearly all the same tasks, and commercial drivers (who work for UPS, Fedex, USPS and various trucking companies) will soon find themselves obsolete and out of work. In agriculture, it won’t be long before crop-picking robots replace the migrant laborers, and even in construction, robots will gradually take over many tasks currently handled by humans.
8) Rise of AI systems to replace white-collar workers: Journalists, artists, coders, writers and more – If you thought your job was safe because you’re a white collar workers, think again: Regenerative AI systems like ChatGPT are on the move and will soon replace journalists, writers, coders, business managers and much more. This is especially true if you are carrying out a job in a routine way, requiring very little innovation or original thought (i.e. you work as a script-reading propagandist for CNN or the Washington Post). It’s easy to see that AI will replace NPCs very easily, in other words. (Non-Player Characters, meaning people who just follow scripts and have no original ideas.)
9) The CDC is rolling recommendations for annual covid injections until you die – The new CDC director Dr. Mandy Cohen is of course an obedient pharma shill. According to The Blaze, she plans to push for annual COVID shots just like annual flu shots — neither of which are effective, by the way. From that story:
“We’re just on the precipice of that, so I don’t want to get ahead of where our scientists are here and doing that evaluation work, but yes, we anticipate that COVID will become similar to flu shots, where it is going to be you get your annual flu shot and you get your annual COVID shot…. That’s where we’re going to,” she continued, and added, “We’re not quite there yet.”
So she’s already decided that annual COVID shots will be approved, even before the scientists have concluded anything on it. As with everything else at the CDC, the politics of Big Pharma drive the science, and Big Pharma’s politics are all determined by profit. So of course annual mRNA injections will do wonders for Big Pharma’s bottom line, and whatever people are oblivious enough to allow themselves to be injected with these experimental jabs will accelerate their trajectory into an early grave.
10) Geoengineering-driven global famine to unleash mass starvation – While we already covered CO2 sequestration and terraforming operations above, this point refers to geoengineering weather control that guides water mass dispersion to produce flood, droughts, storms or anything else that can damage crops and cause widespread food scarcity and food inflation. See Geoengineering.news for more headlines covering this.
11) Infertility chemicals are being placed in the food supply (atrazine, glyphosate, hormone disruptors) to reduce population sustainability – It’s true that atrazine, the No. 2 most common herbicide in our food supply, is a chemical castrator that “turns the frogs gay.” In doing so, it also causes loss of reproductive viability, leading to population reduction. We currently test for atrazine in our mass spec food science laboratory, and we can confirm that we are seeing atrazine in the human food supply. We also test for glyphosate and heavy metals, among other things, and we see a lot of contamination of the food supply chain.
12) Globalists are preparing to initiate the end of debt-based economics that have driven cheap food and affordable growth of human populations – Cheap food comes from cheap energy. Cheap energy is easier to come by when you have cheap money… i.e. artificially low interest rates and lots of money printing stimulus to prop up a zombie economy. The economics of MMT (Magical Monetary Theory, where delusional economists thinking money can be printed to oblivion without causing any problems) are disastrous in the long run, and when the global debt pyramid of US dollar debt comes to an end, it will unleash a black hole-like monetary vortex that will destroy businesses, wealth and entire economies in record time. This global fiat currency “rug pull” is all being engineered and timed for maximum destructive impact, and it is drawing closer by the day. Soon, globalist banks will ditch dollars and call for a global switch to a CBDC system where they can surveil and control all your income sources and expenditures.
https://www.brighteon.com/embed/85d14547-2653-42aa-8ad2-1202e71ecebe
What Adams fails to mention is the chemtrails that are causing a host of illnesses and deaths.
In addition these horrors is the land grabs by governments happening in Holland and more recently in Maui. The plan is to herd people off the land into 15 minute cities where they can be easily monitored and eventually exterminated.
More on Maui: Looks like a NWO Land Grab. New Maui Rezoning Law is a Land Grab
My final thoughts are that the situation is absurd on many levels. I don’t blame the people for the pollution. I blame the CEOs of industry who want to sell us oil and coal. They have suppressed forms of free energy like those developed by Nikola Tesla and have always considered profits rather than the environment. I also blame advertisers who have promoted a lifestyle of endless consumption.
We don’t have too many people. We have too many sociopathic billionaires who are hoarding the wealth and too many generals who are engaging in weather manipulation. When the politicians say they want to save the planet they don’t mean save the planet for the people they mean saving it for themselves and the billionaires. If that means killing off 95% of the population that’s fine with them.
The entire situation is so absurd we might as well laugh about it. Here is SNL and Tony Heller to help us do just that.
Weekend Update: U.N.’s Climate Change Report – SNL
Posted onAugust 10, 2023 byTony Heller
Last week the United Nations said earth is experiencing “global boiling.” We continued documenting the world-ending crisis over the last few days in Wyoming and Colorado. It is dangerous work, but someone has to do it.
Update September 15th, 2023.
In Florida, the last three hurricanes arrived with such precision and destruction that many now believe the government is WEAPONIZING weather
09/04/2023 // Ethan Huff // 6.7K Views
Tags: chemtrails, conspiracy, deception, destruction, disaster, Florida, geoengineered, hurricane, Hurricane Ian, Hurricane Idalia, Hurricane Michael, Hurricanes, Idalia, national security, Unexplained, weapons, weapons tech, weather, weather terrorism
Hurricanes and tropical storms have been hitting Florida and other nearby states and islands since the beginning of time, but are all of these major weather events really natural occurrences?
According to State of the Nation, the three most recent hurricanes to devastate Florida were “geoengineered superstorms designed to inflict maximum damage on a targeted coastline.”
Whether intentional to cause damage or simply an experiment to see how their newfangled weather weapons work, Florida’s most recent storms appear to be military operations “using different techniques and / or progressively increasing power as a barbaric test on both environment and people.”
State of the Nation is confident declaring this because each of the past three major hurricanes to hit Florida shows “hallmark signatures of a manufactured frankenstorm that is quite obviously steered and intensified at just the right time to catch the victimized communities completely off guard.”
“The only exception is the currently active Hurricane Idalia as it careens through the eastern Florida Panhandle. While there seems to be no last-minute trick to this mega-hurricane so far, it was quite quickly and methodically intensified into a Cat 4 and aimed at the single most vulnerable coastline in Florida.”
(Related: Hurricane Ian brought with it massive destruction of Florida’s citrus crop.)
Weather manipulators timed Hurricane Dora to feed the flames of the Lahaina disaster
Before Idalia, it was Hurricane Ian that hit Southwest Florida last September. Before that it was Hurricane Michael, which devastated Florida in October of 2018.
Then there is Hurricane Ivan, which hit the Pensacola area in September of 2004, and the infamous Hurricane Andrew, which wrecked the coastline south of Miami back in 1992.
Whether all of these hurricanes were geoengineered weather weapons or not, there are certainly questions that deserve answers pertaining to the pinpointed devastation that seemed to occur.
With the exception of Andrew, which may have occurred before the advent of weather manipulation, Idalia, Ian, and Michael all tracked in such a way that some are convinced they were geoengineered.
Then we have what State of the Nation calls the “brazen geoterrorist attack on Maui,” which involved the use of directed energy weapons (DEWs). That incident occurred at the same time as Hurricane Dora, which “fed the flames of the arson-triggered firestorms that burned down Lahaina.”
“Those high winds gave the NOW (new world order) pyroterrorists plausible deniability, which has served them well in light of so much hard evidence of a full-blown, military-conducted geoterrorism operation throughout Maui on that fateful Tuesday, August 8, 2023.”
Considering Idalia struck an area that has not seen a storm this large since the late 1800s, it is especially suspicious – that and the fact that the storm caused a large oak tree in front of the governor’s mansion to split in half and fall on the house while Gov. Ron DeSantis and his family were inside.
Was Idalia and the wreckage it caused intentional or just a coincidence? Was the storm an act of God or was it an intentional act of geoengineered weather manipulation and warfare against the people of Florida?
“Of course, the chaos and confusion from an overwhelming wind storm on a highly exposed island or coastal community provide further cover for the terrorists to commit all manner of sabotage and damage,” State of the Nation further stressed.
“If they can take out a whole town in a flash like the NWO perps did in Maui, why do folks not see the same pattern with the unrelenting weather warfare directed at the Freedom State of Florida?!”
More of the latest news about weaponized weather can be found at Geoengineering.news.
Sources for this article include:
THE GREAT GREEN CON: Bill Gates wants to address “global warming” by chopping down and burying TREES
09/06/2023 // Belle Carter // 4.4K Views
Tags: badclimate, badscience, bill gates, biomass burial, carbon credits, carbon removal, climate alarmism, climate hoax, CO2, conspiracy, corruption, deception, deforestation, Ecology, environment, EpochTV, fake science, global warming, globalist, green living, green tyranny, insanity, junk science, Kodama Systems, propaganda, stupid
Business magnate Bill Gates wants to tackle what climate alarmists have been cautioning people about – global warming – by cutting trees down and burying them. These, according to him, will reduce carbon emissions and cool down the planet.
In a recent episode of EpochTV‘s “Crossroads,” award-winning investigative reporter Joshua Philipp discussed how Gates is carrying out another globalist push to depopulate – only from an entirely different angle: taking down the forest, tucking the trees “six feet under” and regulating the “free oxygen” people breathe.
Gates and other investors are betting Kodama Systems, which describes itself as an innovator in forest restoration, can reduce carbon dioxide (CO2) in the air by chopping down trees and burying them. The said forest management company has raised $6.6 million in a series of seed funding from Gates’ climate fund Breakthrough Energy Ventures, as well as Congruent Ventures and other investors.
The scientists added that burying trees can save the environment as it can reduce global warming and wildfires. They believe that forests and trees are a fire hazard. “I don’t know where they’re finding these scientists, by the way,” the podcast host stated. “Normally a lumberjack cuts trees to sell the lumber to build houses. They are arguing that they want to rather than sell the timber, take all the wood and just bury it because they are saying that is a better solution. And so, in other words, this is business. Because they are getting money to create carbon offsets and this is what Bill Gates is financing.”
He also added that the U.S. Forest Services aims to thin out 70 million acres of Western forest, mostly in California in the next decade, extracting more than one billion tons of bone-dry biomass. Usually, after such forest thinning, logs of marketable size go to sawmills, with most of the rest piled up and later burned under controlled conditions. But Kodama wants to bury the leftovers in earthen vaults designed to maintain dry and anoxic (oxygen-free) conditions and protect the wood from rotting or burning.
Meanwhile, as per the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), trees absorb and store CO2 in their fibers, helping clean the air. According to the Arbor Day Foundation, a mature tree absorbs more than 48 pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in one year and releases oxygen in exchange. “So, you’d actually want more trees. If you actually believe the climate change narrative, you’d actually think that the solution is to plant more trees,” Philipp pointed out.
However, Gates still bankrolled Kodama’s drive in a “stealth effort to bury wood for carbon removal.” The way this racket works is that they are creating a product claiming to offset carbon emissions, and the “creator of the project” gets paid by certain states for the “saleable carbon offsets” and maybe someday tax credits, the host explained. (Related: Unmasking the Great Reset: Schwab, Gates, and the sinister WEF plot to depopulate the world using COVID vaccines & climate change lies.)
Follow the money: Biomass burial is a “promising” industry
Along with the seed money, Kodama has already received $1.1 million in grants from California’s forest fire agency and others, as well as purchase commitments for the carbon credits tied to the first 400 tons of trees it buries. Those credits could fetch $200 a ton.
In addition, payments company Stripe also provided a $250,000 research grant to the company and its research partner, the Yale Carbon Containment Lab, as part of a broader carbon removal announcement. That grant will support a pilot effort to bury waste biomass harvested from California forests and study how well it prevents the release of greenhouse gases, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Review reported.
It also agreed to purchase about 415 tons of carbon dioxide eventually sequestered by the company for another $250,000, if that proof-of-concept project achieves specific benchmarks.
“Biomass burial has the potential to become a low-cost, high-scale approach for carbon removal, though there is a need for further investigation into its long-term durability,” said Joanna Klitzke, procurement and ecosystem strategy lead for Stripe.
For the last several years, the financial firm has pre-purchased tons of carbon dioxide that startups aim to eventually draw out of the air and permanently sequester, in an effort to help build up a carbon removal industry. It has also helped establish a different model for counteracting corporate climate emissions that goes beyond simply purchasing carbon credits from popular offset projects, such as those that involve planting trees.
Visit Globalism.news for more news about the dubious plans and actions of globalists like Bill Gates.
Watch the video below that talks about how Gates spearheads the cutting and burying of trees.
https://www.brighteon.com/embed/30da41a0-afa4-44bf-b515-8a97a624ba98
This video is from the TNTVNEWS channel on Brighteon.com.
Update November 2, 2023.
Why did Hurricane Otis get so strong, so fast?
The storm burst to Category 5 strength before making a devastating landfall near Acapulco, Mexico.
by Jeff Masters and Bob Henson October 25, 2023
Excerpt
In what the National Hurricane Center called a “nightmare scenario,” Hurricane Otis made landfall near Acapulco, Mexico, at 1:25 a.m. CDT on Wednesday, October 25, as a catastrophic Category 5 hurricane with 165 mph winds and a central pressure of 923 mb. Otis unexpectedly intensified from a tropical storm with 65 mph winds to a Category 5 storm with 165 mph winds — an astonishing 100 mph increase — in the 24 hours before landfall. Rapid intensification is extremely dangerous because it leaves people little time to prepare for strong storms. The phenomenon is expected to happen more often as the climate warms.
This quote indicates that Otis was a rare and dangerous storm. I’m sure that it was intensified by HAARP to advance the agenda of depopulation and Jeff Berwick agrees with me.
Nature or Weather Weapon? Acapulco Destroyed By “Hurricane” Otis
Update March 19th, 2024
Climate Change is Unfalsifiable Woo-Woo Pseudoscience (2015)
by Corbett | Mar 16, 2024 |
FROM 2015: Karl Popper famously said, “A theory that explains everything explains nothing.” So what do you make of the theory that catastrophic manmade CO2-driven “climate change” can account for harsher winters and lighter winters, more snow and less snow, droughts and floods, more hurricanes and less hurricanes, more rain and less rain, more malaria and less malaria, saltier seas and less salty seas, Antarctica ice melting and Antarctic ice gaining and dozens of other contradictions? Popper gave a name to “theories” like this: pseudoscience.
TRANSCRIPT
One of the giants in the history of the philosophy of science, Karl Popper, once famously observed that a theory that explains everything explains nothing.
And, to be sure, the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change appears to explain everything.
After all, we all know that climate change makes for shorter winters . . . except for when it makes for harsher winters.
And climate change means less snow . . . except for when climate change means more snow.
And climate change causes droughts in California and floods in Texas and Oklahoma, and generally makes wet places wetter and dry places drier, except when it makes wet places drier and dry places wetter.
And climate change causes more hurricanes at the same time as it causes fewer hurricanes.
Climate change causes more rain, but less water? . . . And less rain, but more water?
Climate change decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it increases the spread of malaria. (But don’t worry! The Terminator himself advises us not to listen to those climate change cynics, hey guys?)
Do I need to go on?
Oh, OK.
Climate change makes San Francisco foggier.
Climate change makes San Francisco less foggy.
Climate change causes duller autumn leaves.
Climate changes causes more colourful autumn leaves.
Climate change makes for less salty seas.
Climate change makes for saltier seas.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to melt.
Climate change causes the polar ice caps to freeze.
Climate change makes the earth hotter, unless the earth isn’t getting hotter, in which case climate change can explain that, too!
What’s the problem here? This sounds like the perfect scientific theory. It can explain literally everything, including self-contradictory things! This means it’s absolutely perfect, isn’t it?
Well, no, not according to Karl Popper and the philosophers of science.
And within the philosophy of science, there’s something called the demarcation problem. How do you differentiate science from pseudoscience?
If you’re at all interested in this, I would suggest you read through Karl Popper’s Conjectures and Refutations, in which he lays out his criterion for differentiating science and pseudoscience, namely falsification.
What on earth does he mean by this?
Well, he starts with a very simple but very profound observation that people are attracted to pseudoscientific theories:
“[. . . b]y their apparent explanatory power. These theories appear to be able to explain practically everything that happened within the fields to which they referred. The study of any of them seemed to have the effect of an intellectual conversion or revelation, open your eyes to a new truth hidden from those not yet initiated. Once your eyes were thus opened you saw confirmed instances everywhere: the world was full of verifications of the theory. Whatever happened always confirmed it. Thus its truth appeared manifest; and unbelievers were clearly people who did not want to see the manifest truth.”
And it occurred to him that although this is usually taken to be a good sign of a theory, “[i]t began to dawn on me [Karl Popper] that this apparent strength was in fact their weakness.”
So he goes on to list his conclusions as to how we ultimately try to differentiate science from pseudoscience, and I think a couple of the most important conclusions here are:
4. A theory which is not refutable by an conceivable event is non-scientific. Irrefutability is not a virtue of a theory, as people often think but a vice.
And also:
7. Some genuinely testable theories, when found to be false, are still upheld by their admirers—for example by introducing ad hoc some auxiliary assumption, or by reinterpreting the theory ad hoc in such a way that it escapes refutation. Such a procedure is always possible, but it rescues the theory from refutation only at the price of destroying, or at least lowering, its scientific status.
And he sums it up by saying: “the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability.”
So, I would say that the ball is in the court of the believers of the catastrophic anthropogenic climate change hypothesis.
By what means can one falsify this hypothesis?
Let’s start with just an even less of a hurdle to come over: what set of observations over what period of time would be enough to refute the theory?
And then, furthermore, are there any actual hypotheses, any predictions that come as a result of this theory that can then be tested against the real world, or real observations?
If the answer to that is no, then . . . well, you’ve got a word for your theory, and it’s not science.
It’s pseudoscience.
So again, the onus is on the believers in the catastrophic anthropogenic climate change hypothesis to come up with some way that you can test and potentially falsify this theory.
Because if you can’t come up with any actual way to answer that question of how you falsify the theory, then you might as well just pray to your witch doctors to save you from the weather gods.
James Corbett, corbettreport.com.
Update December 1, 2024.
Finally more scientists are waking up to the hoax.
With Trump soon to be inaugurated, climate scientists declare SUDDEN END to “climate emergency” narrative
11/25/2024 // Ethan Huff // 3K Views
Tags: badclimate, badscience, cancel Democrats, Censored Science, Climate, climate change, climate emergency, climate science, global warming, honest, insanity, progress, Trump, truth, weather
https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-11-25-climate-scientists-declare-sudden-end-climate-emergency.html
All these years of fearmongering over a “melting” planet and “boiling” oceans were for naught now that the so-called “climate emergency” has been discarded as junk science.
The Czech division of the International Climate Intelligence Group (Clintel) held a two-day climate conference in Prague earlier this month at the Chamber of Deputies of the Czech Republic. There, climate scientists declared and affirmed “that the imagined and imaginary ‘climate emergency’ is at an end.”
Several of the world’s leading scientists and researchers spoke at the event, making it clear to everyone there that just about everything the world has been told about climate change and global warming is highly exaggerated at best, and flat-out false in reality.
“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which excludes participants and published papers disagreeing with its narrative, fails to comply with its own error-reporting protocol and draws conclusions some of which are dishonest, should be forthwith dismantled,” it was further stated at the conference.
(Related: According to climate professor Bill McGuire, the only way to prevent a climate breakdown involves “culling” the human population – but not himself, of course.)
CO2 isn’t increasing global temperatures
One of the most impactful declarations at the conference had to do with carbon dioxide (CO2), the boogeyman molecule of the climate cult. The world’s most diehard climate cultists fear CO2 more than just about anything else because they believe it is causing planetary temperatures to increase.
The reality, of course, is that CO2 is simply plant food. Plants produce oxygen for humans to breathe, and humans exhale CO2 that plants use to grow and thrive. It really is as simple as that.
To climate cultists, however, CO2 is basically poison and must be stopped. The climate conference in Prague debunked this myth once and for all, exposing the entire climate narrative as a scam.
Even if every nation on earth successfully reached “net zero” emissions by the 2050 target date, global temperatures would only be about 0.1 C cooler, maybe, with no actual emissions reductions.
“So far, the attempts to mitigate climate change by international agreements such as the Paris Agreement have made no difference to our influence on climate, since nations such as Russia and China, India and Pakistan continue greatly to expand their combustion of coal, oil and gas,” reports Watts Up With That.
“The cost of achieving that 0.1 C reduction in global warming would be $2 quadrillion, equivalent to 20 years’ worldwide gross domestic product.”
A call was made at the conference for the entire global scientific community to take a step back from climate crusading and instead reflect on the matter from a different perspective.
The scientists at the event uniformly called upon “the entire scientific community to cease and desist from its persecution of scientists and researchers who disagree with the current official narrative on climate change and instead to encourage once again the long and noble tradition of free, open and uncensored scientific research, investigation, publication and discussion.”
In their letter to “the entire scientific community,” those in attendance at the conference made out several key points about the climate that deserve repeating:
1) The sun, not greenhouse gases, is primarily responsible for global temperature patterns.
2) The industrial era did nothing of any significance to impact the climate.
3) There is zero evidence to suggest that extreme weather events are in any way increasing, even if they get more media coverage due to technological advancements.
4) Despite having spent trillions upon trillions of dollars trying to stop emissions, global temperatures have still risen, albeit modestly, since 1990.
More related news coverage can be found at Climate.news.
Sources for this article include:
Planetary Liberation Community 